Sunday, April 21, 2019

The Battle of Easter: Part 3



The Battle of Easter: Part 3



We finally reach the cross, the final moments of Jesus’ death. Jesus is crucified in between two thieves and this exchange happens:

Luke 23:39-43
One of the criminals who hung there hurled insults at him: “Aren’t you the Messiah? Save yourself and us!” But the other criminal rebuked him. “Don’t you fear God,” he said, “since you are under the same sentence? We are punished justly, for we are getting what our deeds deserve. But this man has done nothing wrong.” Then he said, “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.” Jesus answered him, “Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise.”
My first observation is that stealing is usually not a capital offense: in the bible, the thief only has to restore and pay twice what he stole. Roman law of the time was similar. So how did these two thieves arrive at Jesus’ side?

It turns out Roman law varied by your status in society. It was illegal in a majority of cases to execute Roman citizens, but the lower your class the harsher the punishment could get. If you were a slave, you could be executed for almost anything. These thieves were definitely among the lower classes and had very few rights.

At least one of these thieves knew theft was wrong, yet chose to do so. Most crimes of theft are due to poverty, and being in the poorer classes he most likely stole for his or his family’s survival. Being at the mercy of the court and their accuser, they were even sentenced to be crucified--a punishment purposely cruel and humiliating, used by Rome to oppress its subjects.

To put it bluntly, these thieves were likely victims of injustice in a system set up against them.


One thief angrily cries out to Jesus to save himself and them. I suppose he realizes the cruelty and injustice of his life, and is rightly bitter and angry. Perhaps he had at one time prayed for someone to save him from a life that led him to poverty; from people who abused and extorted him; from a life he couldn’t escape because of oppression. Maybe then he could have led a righteous life. In this plea there is accusation. The Messiah is the savior and liberator of the people, so what is Jesus waiting for? Has God abandoned this thief?

The thief on Jesus’ other side felt he deserved his punishment, and calls it “just”. His life was of little value to society and this is what his life amounts to, hanging on a cross. He believed this is the sum of all he is worth. He’d already accepted his death.

I feel for both of these thieves--they were both brought to the lowest of places and have to come to terms with it. In my lowest places, I am both these thieves: angry and ashamed before God; I feel both injustice and self-condemnation. When I feel low, I am angry about all the unjust circumstances of my past, many of which I had no control. I am angry that God didn’t answer all my prayers. I am angry when I look at the world and there is so much wrong. I am also ashamed and question myself. I feel I am not enough, and perhaps all the wrong things in my life are what I deserve. I feel I can never measure up to what is valued in this society. I feel that I am not worth God’s love.

Holding onto his last hope, the second thief is able to rebuke the other one and dares to ask Jesus to remember him. He must have recognized something in Jesus, as they were both hanging on their crosses, that convinced him that Jesus was truly a king. What was it?

Maybe this is what Jesus was waiting for as he withstood all the trials before his death: Jesus was waiting to be with this thief (perhaps both thieves). He didn’t save himself or them, but he chose to be by their side and died with them. He made sure they were not alone in their anger and despair, in the worst moment of their lives.

Jesus promises this second thief that they would be together in paradise that very day. What was this paradise Jesus was promising as he died? Where did he go?

When Jesus stands powerless before his friends, before the temple, the government, the crowd, and on the cross, I believe he is presenting himself. He does not deliver a message, a miracle, nor a display of any sort, just himself. It is as if he is saying, “This is who I am, who God is. I am giving myself over completely to you.” This must be the very heart of God.

What if God never wanted anything from us to begin with? And what if God just wanted to love us and be with us, and this is the promise that God is keeping: that God will be with us forever (Matt 28:20). We ask for so many things, some of which God gives us, yet what God wants to give to us is all of himself.

Is this what paradise looks like? To be given the whole heart of God?

I wonder about the first thief, the one that hurled insults at Jesus. What did he think after he heard the exchange between Jesus and the other thief? How did he feel when Jesus cried out, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” and know that Jesus felt abandoned too? Did he hear when Jesus asked God to forgive those who executed him and mocked him? What were his final thoughts as he saw Jesus die alongside him in the same way he did, hanging on his own cross? Did he wish to be in paradise with Jesus as well?

When I feel disappointed and angry with God, does he understand and want to be with me still?


I also wonder how much pain Jesus was in when he heard the first thief ask Jesus to save him? How about when the second thief condemned himself and was in despair? Did Jesus hear the cries of all who felt abandoned and cry out “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” on our behalf?

Jesus, as a human with the heart of God, lived to show us how much God loves us and wants to be with us. God doesn't necessarily save us in all things, but promises to be with us in everything. God isn't in the place where we become holy and good, but is in the place where we are suffering the most, where we cry out in anger and judge ourselves in shame. To find God, we don't go to the place where we are at our best, we go to the place of our pain, at our cross. God is waiting there for us.




**********

P.S.-
I wrote previously, at the beginning of Lent this year, that I would contemplate what it meant to have God present with me in all circumstances. First of all, I found myself publishing my first blog post. Though I was afraid, I felt God had confidence in me even if no one read or liked it. Mostly I wanted to share some of the ideas that have encouraged me in my faith, and perhaps encourage other. I’ve often felt like the two disciples on the road to Emmaus whose hearts were burning when they spoke with Jesus (Luke 24:32).


I also found myself pursuing some of the other passions that I had been afraid to pursue, and are things I have zero experience in! Once I jumped in though, it isn’t as bad as I thought, and a good portion of my anxiety disappeared (though it may get harder, I expect).

I was bolstered by feeling the confidence that God would be with me in my success or failure, and that my worth in God’s eyes would not change. Perhaps this is what it means to receive God’s immeasurable grace (Eph 2:4-9). It is not something I can work towards by achieving goodness, but by pursuing and knowing that love and grace. I feel like God has given a piece of me back to myself. Is this a bit of what paradise is like?

P.P.S.-
I did call this the Battle of Easter, but I realized too late that I never wrote about Easter Sunday. My friend explained to me that it still worked because Easter was the victory lap of the whole battle. I will say this about the resurrection and ascension: Jesus remained in his human body or some form of it. What does this mean? He also performed other signs and explained things that are not recorded (John 20:30). What were they and is there a way to discover this ourselves?

P.P.P.S-
It’s okay if you don’t fully agree with my scriptural analysis, but I really do hope you are encouraged in your faith. If you enjoyed this, I have another one coming up for Mother’s Day. Thanks for reading!



Friday, April 19, 2019

The Battle of Easter: Part 2



The Battle of Easter: Part 2


Jesus claims he can call down armies of angels, but does he?

At the temple in Jerusalem he has wildly false and inconsistent accusations thrown at him. Finally the high priest directly asks him, “Are you the Son of God?” to which Jesus replies, “I am,” said Jesus, “and you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power and coming with the clouds of heaven.” (Mark 14:61-62). Yes! It’s showtime! In your face!




And… nothing. This is possibly the most disappointing reveal of a god, ever. Instead he argues for a bit, and subjects himself to abuse. The same thing happens when he appears before the Roman governor Pilate.

In his 40 days in the wilderness, the devil tempted him to jump off the temple and show himself floating down with angels. Jesus replies, “Do not put the Lord your God to the test,” which in turn refers to the the time when the Israelites questioned the character of God saying, “Did you bring us out here to die? Is the Lord really with us or not?” Unfortunately, Jesus really was going to die. Is God still with him and going to keep those promises? Is God really with us? Is Jesus, the man before the temple court, really the Son of God who came to save us?

Why won’t Jesus show himself fully here?

**********

Let’s dig into some theology here. Are you ready?




There are many theories about what Jesus’ subsequent torture, humiliation, and execution mean. Several of these atonement theologies claim that this is a form of payment to redeem humans from their wrongdoing, or sins. The payment was made either to the devil or to God. Penal substitutionary atonement goes so far as to say that Jesus suffered in our place, meaning he suffered the punishments we should really suffer from a God who demands justice. God is angry at all of us and we’re so awful by nature that everyone deserve this life sentence.

I have many problems with this idea. First, Jesus’s death is often compared to the old rituals of animal sacrifice to God. Never in those scriptures, though, is the animal ever to be tortured before a long and cruel death. The animal sacrifices were always to be treated well and blemish free. Only death was required.

Secondly, one of the arguments is that this is one of the most painful ways to die, therefore it encompasses other punishments. How can one really know what would be the most painful to Jesus? There are so many other ways to suffer in this world. He is never enslaved, he does not undergo childhood trauma, he is does not have an incurable disease. Even though they live under Roman rule, Jesus is a respectable Jewish male in a predominantly Jewish region. He isn’t a victim of racism, misogyny, or other types of identity discrimination. One lifetime wouldn’t even come close to all the things that humans around the world suffer right now.

Third, how does God restore justice using injustice? Is God really satisfied by being cruel to Jesus? Is this the character of God? 
The most challenging part about this for me is that our relationship with God becomes one of wrongdoer and punisher. Even if Jesus is the intermediary, this becomes our starting point, that from the minute we come into this world we deserve punishment. This implies all the sufferings we experience we bring upon ourselves. We are judged not by our actions, but by our very identity. How do we start from there and develop a relationship as a “child of God” (1 John 3:1)? What God do we worship?

There is also the Moral Influence atonement theory, which I don’t disagree with, where Jesus came to teach and show us God through his life and actions. The death of Jesus, caused by his radical teachings, and the arrival of the Holy Spirit compel us to transform. Jesus did indeed spend time among people, showing them who God really is.

I suppose the atonement theory that makes the most sense to me is Christus Victor, where the devil tries to kill Jesus, and the resurrection of Jesus is the victory over sin, death, and the devil. It paints God as someone who suffers with us and who wants to save us from death.

My theory is similar, but includes that the re-union of God and humanity was at the center of the life of Jesus. Part of my theory is that the actual metaphysical part of reuniting God with humans was fulfilled by Jesus living as a human, without using godly powers to benefit himself. This concept is called hypostatic union in Christian theology: Jesus being both fully god and fully human simultaneously. He couldn’t even avoid paying his taxes! (Mark 12:13-17) If he ever dropped the “fully human” part from birth through death, this union would be void.

Who, being in very nature a God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage; rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness. And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to death—even death on a cross!  (Philippians 2:6-8)
In Greek, the word for sin, “hamartia”, can also be translated as “missing the mark”. In Hebrew, the word for sacrificial offering is “korban”, which is closely related to the word “be near”. The interpretation is that the ancient offerings were to bring people closer to God. If Jesus was the sacrificial offering for sin, could the death of Jesus be part of what brings God and humans together? Is Satan, perhaps, using humiliation and torture, just to prevent Jesus’ ultimate death?

**********

It is remarkable how many times he is mockingly named king and called on to save himself before he dies. If we believe what he’s said and done up to this point, he can absolutely save himself and become king. In the 40 days in the wilderness, the devil offers exactly that, to make Jesus ruler of the world. This is the same offer presented here--to claim his power and authority to become our benevolent king.



How tempting is it now, to reclaim the world and maybe he didn’t even have to bow to the devil. He could overthrow Caesar, free all the captives, restore justice, and even continue teaching everyone right from wrong. Most of the prophecies about the Messiah describe a glorious and majestic king, so what happened?

When the Roman governor, Pilate, leads Jesus and a revolutionary and murderer named Barabbas before the local crowd so they can choose one to release, they chose the revolutionary. They shout, “Crucify him!” (Matt 27:22-23). The crowds were riled up by Jesus’ enemies, but I wonder how many of them had followed him and believed in him before. Were they angry and disappointed that Jesus didn’t save them from the oppressive Roman rule? Why wasn’t Jesus the revolutionary? Didn’t he come to save them?

There are so many reasons for Jesus to give up on his humanity and to give up on us. His best friends abandon him, most people don’t believe him, so many in power are corrupt. He helped so many people, but they didn’t want the picture of God that he showed them. And now they are showing their worst selves. Why would he still want to be one of us?

It’s as if the devil is saying, “See these disgusting people! They don’t believe you and certainly don’t deserve you. They don’t deserve your love or your sacrifice. How many of your friends are left? They turned on you when you needed them--everyone is in it for themselves. How easily they become base and cruel beings. This is what humans truly are. And you know what? They’re all going to forget you and none of this will work in the end. Save yourself and become king!”

Jesus’ reply might be, “I am still going through with this. Yes God has lead me here to die, but I believe God will fulfill the promises. I will trust that my friends will come back and even those that are condemning me will turn around and believe me. I have faith in them, that even after I am not around, countless others will still believe even if they don’t see me.”

Jesus had said, “Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only.” (And Deuteronomy 13:4 adds "and cling to him").  For Jesus, all the kingdoms of the world are not worth as much as being with us, reuniting us with a loving God. Yet, our prayers every day are for God to come and save us, to fix our problems, to right every wrong in this world, to bring healing. In fact that is an ancient promise God made. No wonder the crowds were angry.

Is this enough for us, though? Is having God better than having the things we need to live? Do we want a God that doesn’t show himself and leaves us to our shaky faith? Do we want a God that refused to use his power to be king?

Is it worth it to only have God?

Tuesday, April 9, 2019

The Battle of Easter: Part 1

The Battle of Easter: Part 1

In my essay about Jesus’ 40 days in the wilderness, I wrote about how Jesus’ choices there were not merely resisting temptations but to choose the path of human life and subsistence. His choice was to join us in our ordinary struggles without using his extraordinary power, privilege, or authority to benefit himself and transcend human existence. His choice was to be with us.

For Jesus to have been fully human, his life must end in death. In his final days, he observes Passover, is consequently betrayed, wrongfully accused and arrested, tortured, abandoned, and then sentenced to death. Finally he is resurrected three days later, which is what we celebrate every year on Easter Sunday in the traditional Christian calendar.

Jesus often foretells his death to his closest friends, which they respond to with denial and confusion. When his friend Peter says, “Never Lord!” to this, Jesus goes so far to call those words from Satan (Matt 16:21-23). Why? Wouldn’t it be natural for Jesus’ friends to not want him to die? It’s pretty extreme to call someone who cares about you the devil, especially when they want to stop something bad from happening.




Well, if we look at it from Satan’s perspective, he wants to prevent God from reuniting with humans at all cost. If recreating the union of God and humans required Jesus to complete his human life, then Satan must prevent Jesus’ death. This is Satan’s last chance, and he is going all out.

The Passover dinner before his death he gives his disciples bread saying, “this is my body”. He gives them wine and calls it his “blood.” In his 40 days in the wilderness, Jesus said, “Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.” We realize now that the bread and the words Jesus was talking about were himself. When he didn’t make bread for himself then, it wasn’t to withstand physical starvation, it was to prepare for this moment. In this metaphorical act, Jesus asks us to remember while we subsist on physical food and drink, we also subsist on God, and that God is one with us.

Later that evening in Gethsemane, we find Jesus praying alone and in a fierce battle of will. He asks that God’s will and not his be fulfilled. Wait, what? Jesus doesn’t want to follow God’s plans! When his disciples fall asleep on him when he needs them the most, he says, “Watch and pray so that you will not enter into temptation. For the spirit is willing, but the body is weak.” (Mark 14:38). I have to admit, sleep is very tempting, especially every morning when my alarm goes off, or in the middle of a boring lecture. It’s the middle of the night, they just drank a bunch of wine, presumably 4 glasses, so it’s just natural. Look, if he wanted his friends to pull an all-nighter, all he had to do was give them a can of Red Bull, problem solved.




The Greek word that is translated to “body” is “sarx” which is also “the flesh” or “human nature”. Could he have been talking about himself as well? Maybe Jesus’ spirit was wholeheartedly willing, but his human being was not? Jesus’ friend, Judas, betrays him, and his other friends abandon him when he is arrested by the temple guards. It was so easy for Satan to take Jesus’ friends away. Were these friends even worth what he was going through?

This is the moment for me when Jesus reveals the man behind the curtain, and all of a sudden you glimpse the powerful son of God. When Jesus is about to be arrested he says:

“Don't you know that I could call on my Father for help, and at once he would send me more than twelve armies of angels? But in that case, how could the Scriptures come true which say that this is what must happen?”  (Matthew 26:53-54)
When Jesus said to them, “I am he,” they moved back and fell to the ground.  (John 18:6)
Here Jesus reveals, it was a conscious choice of his to not escape.


See also: He Chose Us: A Reflection on Lent